To honour the truth and change the world for the better would you admit atheism is a logical fallacy

To honour the truth and change the world for the better would you admit atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly that no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist? An example of the atheist logical fallacy is the quote by Epicurus “Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”. With the arguments presented Epicurus can only conclude that an omnipotent and benevolent God doesn’t exist, never that God doesn’t exist. Atheism defends an idea without any arguments and the result are nonsensical remarks like “who created God?” and many others. God is necessary for existence because nothing can be created from nothing because nothing is absence of existence. To defeat atheism you don’t have to defend your particular idea of God. The discovery that atheism is a logical fallacy, a deceitful reasoning, a lie that is taught to beautiful, innocent and vulnerable children, needs to be news.

My question to atheists is does the evolution of species have a beginning or is eternal? Evolution can not last forever in an infinite regress of causes and effects without a beginning of existence, therefore the creation of life has a beginning.

The only way to end religion is to find human life on another planet. How could possibly be justified that Jesus didn’t let them know that he died for our sins on planet Earth or that the Qurʾan only talks about how planet Earth was created but ignored the other planet? All humanity’s efforts should go to accomplish this endeavor for our own survival. The Bible and Qurʾan say that the Earth was created in a few days, just like that, like if the creator of the universe was talking like you talk when you decorate your house, and they call the nonsense scientific evidence! Religion and atheism are cults inmune to arguments and maybe someone from the other planet came up with the same theory on God based on logic and rational thinking that i thought of to confirm I am right.

If human life was discovered on another planet would religious people abandon religion? Humanity’s efforts should go to accomplish the endeavor for our own survival. What else could end religion? Atheism can not end religion because it is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly that no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist, a deceitful reasoning or lie that is taught from parents to children. Atheists say that atheism is the lack of belief in God because there is no evidence that the creator of the creation exists. Atheists don’t deny that the creation exists, at least some because others say “you assume the creation” that means “you assume i exist”. Creation is what has a beginning of existence or is not eternal. The creation was created by nothing or something. Atheists admit nothing can be created from nothing because nothing is absence of existence, at least some because others say “with quantum physics something can be created from nothing”. Therefore to not believe God exists is to believe everything was created from nothing, to believe the universe popped up into existence from non existence. Could God, the intelligent creator of the creation, be a metaphysical entity instead of a person like you with a terrible temper living in the sky surrounded by angels and satan that do religious miracles interfering with reality for prayers and reveals his nonsensical truth to his favorite prophet? Could God be all eternal and infinite reality? Could you at least give it a thought? Why God has to be sky daddy? I am a psychologist trying to change blind faith in the impossible for reason.

The universe can not be eternal because you would not exist in an infinite regress of causes and effects without a beginning of existence. You would not exist if the universe had an infinite past. You would not exist if the evolution of species was eternal. If you understand would you please explain the obvious to other atheists?

The concept of religion is that we are born condemned to eternal torture and is our fault, and to save ourselves showing his infinite love for us we have to sacrifice our happiness worshipping, obeying and fearing a religious god for the empty promise of eternal happiness, because there is not life without death and happiness without unhappiness. Religious people are living an horrendous lie that is indoctrinated by repetition and intimidation to their innocent and vulnerable children. Unfortunately and fortunately for religious people God exists because nothing can be created from nothing and nobody ever got away with hurting God’s Creation.

Could you please listen to me because it is important the truth? Religion is a lie that looks like a lie, and don’t get me wrong, atheism too. God exists because nothing can be created from nothing because nothing is absence of existence, but unfortunately for religious people the intelligent creator of the creation is not a person like you with a terrible temper living in the sky surrounded by angels and satan that do religious miracles interfering with reality for prayers and reveals his nonsensical truth to his favorite prophet. God is a metaphysical entity, something real, whatever created the creation, substance, the first uncaused cause that the kalam cosmological argument talks about, a mind, all eternal and infinite reality. Religion is a lie because the concept of God for all, or nearly all, religions is the same because religions copy concepts from other religions. All religions claim to be truth, the word of the creator of the universe revealed to a prophet, and we know that at least all but one are made up. For example the concept of hell and heaven was made up by false religions before Islam or Christianity came up with it. How did the false prophets know that there was hell and heaven if the truth was never revealed to them by the true God? How did the false prophets know that God is a personal god that listen to prayers and interferes with reality? If a false religion made up angels what are the chances that in reality angels exist? What are the chances that making up a god coincides with what is claimed to be the true God or reality?

Ukranian people, if i am lucky, would go down in history as the most stupid nation of all time. Mark my words. The war in Ukraine would end just making news of what you just read. The revelation that atheism is a logical fallacy would end the war.

The quote “Remember, whatever happens, God either made it happen or could’ve stopped it if he’d wanted. Or he is useless. Or doesn’t exist. Exceptions?” by Ricky Gervais is another of the innumerable examples of the atheist logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly that no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. Stop lying! Stop hurting innocent and vulnerable children!

Are atheists dumb or imbeciles or both? I say atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly that no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist and they all reply confirming i am right. With arguments that debunk the religious idea of a personal God only can be concluded that the personal religious god doesn’t exist.

Atheists ask God to be proven under the microscope while they don’t even want to admit atheism is a logical fallacy, or a lie that is taught to beautiful, innocent and vulnerable children, that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly that no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. And example of the atheist logical fallacy is the quote “Remember, whatever happens, God either made it happen or could’ve stopped it if he’d wanted. Or he is useless. Or doesn’t exist. Exceptions?”. With the arguments presented only can be concluded that a personal religious god doesn’t exist, never that God doesn’t exist. If you don’t understand the atheist logical fallacy children would explain it to you because is easy to understand being honest and impossible lying to oneself. Atheism is a lie that looks like a lie and atheists defend an idea without any arguments and the result is the most stupid question of all eternal time “who created God?” and many other nonsensical remarks. It is impossible the existence of the creation without the existence of the creator because nothing can be created from nothing and a kid understand the logic.

I am a psychologist trying to wake humanity up. Trying to ressurect humanity to be honest. Humanity are imbecile and i can prove it. I can only row in the right direction, to take the boat to a safe port and whether i succeed to save lives or not depends on how hard others row in the wrong direction. I try to save lives living for love and life against the imbeciles that make my life impossible. I can die failing but I would never regret having done with i can with what I got for the wellbeing of humanity. Humanity are handicapped emotionally and intellectually. To understand for yourself how imbecile are humanity tell anyone that a psychologist claims to have discovered the cure to addiction and can prove it saving lives to see if you get an intelligent answer. I thought that after discovering that atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly that no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist i would make it and i was wrong because atheism keeps strong after being exposed as a lie. Do you understand anything I am saying? If you can help me to make my language easier to understand i would even reward you with money for your effort and time.

¿Si vida humana se descubriese en otros planetas abandonarías la religión? Los esfuerzos de la humanidad deben ser enfocados en conseguir este objetivo por nuestra propia supervivencia. De todas las religiones solo una podría ser la verdad y sin embargo todas, o casi todas, coinciden en el concepto del dios personal al que adorar, obedecer y temer que es complacido con rituales y sacrificio. ¿Entiendes por qué? Es importante que intentes entender porque lo único que importa es la realidad. Para los musulmanes el Corán es la verdad absoluta revelada por Allah al profeta Mahoma y sin embargo las religiones anteriores al Islam que fueron inventadas por charlatanes coinciden en su concepto con la que se cree que es la religión verdadera. ¿Si las otras religiones provienen de la imaginación, o de cómo se quería que fuese el creador de la creación, cómo es posible que coincida casualmente con el concepto del verdadero Dios? Ofrezco un entendimiento de la realidad con Dios, el inteligente creador de la creación, y sin religión. Dios es una entidad metafísica, algo, lo que sea que haya creado la creación, sustancia, la primera causa no causada de la que habla el argumento cosmológico de kalam, toda la realidad eterna e infinita. Nada puede ser creado de la nada porque la nada es ausencia de existencia, luego todo proviene de Dios siendo Dios, la misma milagrosa sustancia o naturaleza transformándose.

Atheism is the absence of belief in God because there is not evidence that the creator of the creation exists. Atheists don’t deny that the creation exists. Creation is what has a beginning of existence or is not eternal, like for example yourself. Atheists agree that nothing can be created from nothing because nothing is absence of existence. Atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly that no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. God exists 100% sure because it is impossible the existence of the creation without the existence of the creator. It is impossible the existence of finitude without the existence of infinitude. Evolution can not last forever therefore life or the universe must have a beginning or creation from an eternal entity. If God was a metaphysical entity that is not to be worshipped, obeyed and feared would you object to the idea of the intelligent creator of the creation? Could God be all eternal and infinite reality instead of sky daddy? God is a metaphysical entity, something, whatever created the creation, the first uncaused cause that the kalam cosmological argument talks about.

You would not exist if the universe was eternal. What more proof do you need that the universe can not be eternal? We are now in the year 2023, could you exist had the universe been eternal, with infinite years back in time?

Atheists say atheism is the lack of belief in God because there is not evidence that the creator of the creation exists. I say atheism is a lie that looks like a lie, a cult inmune to arguments that hurt innocent and vulnerable children. Atheism is a logical fallacy or deceitful reasoning that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly that no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. If you didn’t understand the atheist logical fallacy children would explain it to you because it is easy to understand being honest and impossible lying to oneself. An example of the innumerable examples of the atheist logical fallacy is the quote by Epicurus “Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”. With the arguments presented Epicurus can only conclude that an omnipotent and benevolent God doesn’t exist, not that God doesn’t exist. Atheists believe God is sky daddy and don’t believe God exists, and they are wrong because they believe. I know because I was atheist. When i was atheist i believed it was impossible i could be wrong because it is impossible that sky daddy exists, and i was wrong because God is not the religious idea of the creator of the creation. Atheism is cognitive dissonance because logically, or rationally, the creation must have the creator because nothing can be created from nothing, but the logic leads to an impossible conclusion when God is believed to be sky daddy. However if God is something, substance, a metaphysical entity, the conclusion becomes possible and the only logical and rational explanation to our own existence. Atheists don’t conceive God as any other than a personal religious god to worship, obey and fear and instead of changing the concept of the intelligent creator of the creation they reject the logic with nonsensical remarks like “who created God?” and many others. Does what i just said make sense to you?

Atheism is like religion, a cult inmune to arguments that harms beautiful, innocent and vulnerable children. Each religious person has his sky daddy like each atheist has his own quantum physics. We know that only one religion could be the revealed truth and the same way we know only one quantum physics could be right and all the others are lies. This fact proves that religious people and atheists are liars, all of them, because God exists because nothing can be created from nothing and God can not know the future of life because free will is an uncaused cause, the creator of an effect that is not created. Charlatan prophets made up the concepts of a personal god that interferes with reality and is pleased with prayers and sacrifice, hell and heaven and others, and miracle of miracles!, coincide with the concepts of what are claimed to be the true religions. Could you be wrong? Is it possible to believe it is impossible to be wrong believing?

Atheism and religion are cults inmune to arguments that harm beautiful, innocent and vulnerable children and i am trying to change your mind with arguments. If i asked you to describe something you don’t know about what are the chances that your description would match reality? If for argument’s sake i asked you to describe the closest planet to Neptune that has not yet been discovered what are the chances that when it is discovered your description would match reality? Muslims claim the Qurʾan is the word of Allah revealed to the honest prophet Muhammad and acknowledge that all the other prophets are liars that made up false religions. Knowing that the other prophets made up their god what are the chances that their description coincide with reality? It is important that you understand my point because your eternal wellbeing depends on understanding reality. False prophets made up concepts like hell and heaven, a personal god that listens to prayers and interferes with reality and is pleased with sacrifice, and many others that coincide with the concept of Islam. There are two explanations, that Islam was influenced and copied concepts from other religions or that those false prophets were miraculously lucky. Unfortunately and fortunately for religious people God exists because nothing can be created from nothing because nothing is absence of existence, and my advice to you is to abandon your religion inmediately because nobody ever got away with hurting God’s Creation and God can not be deceived. Life is not a joke that was created from nothing like atheists believe.

I would like to collaborate with the program and i would reward you generously for helping me out. I would like you to explain in a program why the universe can not be eternal, and other concepts that atheists i debate with are ignorant about. I find myself explaining the same concepts again and again while atheists platforms seem interested in not having them understood.

I would reward you generously beyond your wildest dreams if you explain in your platform why “who created god?” is the most stupid, idiot, imbecile, moronic question of all eternal time. I swear to eternal God that you and your family would never have to work for the rest of your life if you just explain the obvious truth to the cult. Atheism is a lie that looks like a lie, and atheists are fools applauding fools. I would reward you for doing what should be done without reward. If you could also explain why the universe can not be eternal it would be a plus. Atheism is a logical fallacy or a deceitful reasoning or a lie that harms innocent and vulnerable children that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly that no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. If you don’t understand the atheist logical fallacy children would explain it to you because it is easy to understand being honest and impossible lying to oneself.

El ateismo y la religión son sectas inmunes a argumentos que hacen daño a niños bonitos, inocentes y vulnerables.  Quiero hablaros de Dios, lo único que importa y existe para mi, la entidad viva metafísica perfecta, la idea de perfección para una buena persona honesta y racional. Empezaré por el principio sin principio porque Dios es eterno. Yo no creo en Dios, yo sé que Dios existe porque nada puede ser creado de la nada porque la nada es ausencia de existencia. De la no existencia no puede ser creada la existencia. ¿Cuantas veces en la iglesia os han explicado por qué el creador inteligente de la creación tiene que existir? Adán y Eva fueron  expulsados del paraíso por comer el fruto prohibido del árbol del conocimiento, por querer saber. El dios cristiano castigó a la humanidad por querer saber y por eso los curas y monjas te quieren ignorante, creyente de bobadas. En cualquier momento podeis hacerme preguntas, objetar o comentar. ¿Si la existencia de Dios es cierta por qué los religiosos usan el verbo “creer” en vez de “saber”? Porque quieren que creas, no que sepas, no quieren que pienses. No hay límites a lo que un religioso puede creer por la promesa vacía de eterna felicidad, porque la realidad es que no existe la vida sin la muerte y la felicidad sin la infelicidad. Quieros explicaros que el amigo imaginario al que adoráis, obedecéis y teméis no existe. De verdad que para entender que no existe el dios religioso solo hay que que pensar. Por supuesto los religiosos creen que piensan por sí mismos creyendo paridas que hacen creen a sus hijos que no piensan por sí mismos y de ese modo el ciclo se perpetua. Siento que estoy hablando a tontos que no quieren entender que están equivocados y mi objetivo como psicólogo es sacar a la humanidad de la secta. Yo fuí religioso y ateo y ahora entiendo que Dios es toda la realidad eterna e infinita y existe existencia después de la muerte porque una inteligencia creó la creación. Yo no sé cómo hablar ni qué decir porque la humanidad está tan imbecilizada que no diría la verdad ni aunque fuese torturada para salvar a sus propios hijos ofreciendo dinero. El concepto de la religión es tan absurdo como que religiosos están adorando a un abusón, un “bully”, creyendo que les ama y les va a recompensar por su sacrificio. ¿Habiendo dicho lo dicho hay alguno que se haya dado cuenta que pertenece a una secta o todavía no? Una secta es un grupo de mentirosos mintiéndose entre ellos. Por amor de Dios, por hijos bonitos, inocentes y vulnerables, por honor, ¿se puede entender que el futuro de la vida no puede ser conocido porque si lo fuese la realidad sería determinística? ¡Si el dios religioso conociese el futuro sus propias acciones estarían determinadas!

Dios creó la creación de si mismo, como la madre crea el hijo. De la nada no puede ser creado nada porque la nada es ausencia de existencia. El ateismo es la creencia de que todo fué creado de la nada, que apareció por arte de mágia. Estoy hablando del creador de la creación, no de un dios religioso. Los ateos no han existido eternamente, por lo tanto fueron creados por sus padres, que fueron creados por sus abuelos y de ese modo en una secuencia que no puede ser infinita y por lo tanto existe una entidad eterna que creó la creación. La secuencia no puede ser infinita porque tu no existirías si tuvieses infinitos antepasados. No creo en Dios, se que la creación fue creada por algo. Es lógica, no hay fé. Es el ateo el que cree que la creación salió de la no existencia. Digo que la creación es realidad y el creador es realidad. ¿Por qué dices que digo que hay algo más allá de la realidad? Panteísmo es llamar al universo Dios. Yo digo que el creador creó el universo. El creador es realidad y de esa realidad crea otra realidad. ¿Cual es el problema? La alternativa es que el universo salió de la no existencia, pero mi explicación es la irracional según los ateos. El creador crea a partir de lo existente. De lo que existe eternamente se crea la creación. La creación es imposible que exista sin el creador. El ateismo es la creencia de que todo salió de la nada, fé ciega en lo imposible

Los ateos dicen que no creen en Dios porque no hay evidencias de que el creador de la creación existe. La creación es lo que tiene un principio de existencia o no es eterno, como por ejemplo tú, y los ateos no niegan que exista la creación, solo niegan que exista el creador. De la no existencia no puede ser creada la existencia por lo tanto la única conclusión lógica es que la creación ha sido creada por el creador. Dios es necesario para la existencia y nada existiría si Dios no existiese.

Would you listen to me because you have been deceived? If I asked you to describe something you don’t know about what are the chances that your description would coincide with reality? If for argument’s sake I asked you to describe the closest planet to Neptune that has not been discovered yet what are the chances that your description would coincide with reality? In the example of the planet you know how are other planets and you could speculate about how could be the unknown planet. The more detailed is the description the more unlikely is that it would coincide with reality. You could guess right that the planet is spherical but it would be unlikely to guess right the diameter, or you could guess right that there is life, but unlikely that you guess right what kind of life. It is infinitely important that you understand my point because your eternal wellbeing depends on understanding reality. What would be the chances of guessing right how is something you don’t have any information about, like God? We know that of all the innumerable religions that dishonest humanity have made up only one could be the revealed truth, therefore only one prophet could be honest and the others are liars or bad people intended to hurt others. The concepts of hell and heaven, a personal god that listens to prayers and interferes with reality and is pleased with sacrifice and many others were made up by false prophets but coincide with the concepts of what are claimed to be the true religions! How on earth a hater making up a god would guess right how is the true god that is claimed to love you!. The truth is that religions are influenced and copy concepts from other religions and no prophet ever listened the absolute truth from the intelligent creator of the universe. Fortunately and unfortunately for religious people God exists because nothing can be created from nothing because nothing is absence of existence and the intelligent creator of the creation is a metaphysical entity, something real, substance, the first uncaused cause that the kalam cosmological argument talks about. Nobody has ever got away with hurting God’s Creation and God can not be deceived. My advice is to abandon atheism and religion inmediately for God’s sake. Life is not a joke that was created from nothing like atheists believe.

listen to me because what i say is easy to understand. From non existence can not be created existence therefore the creation must be created from existence. If you agree then you understand God exists and if you don’t agree children would explain it to you because it is easy to understand being honest and impossible lying to oneself.

Para acabar con la guerra en Ucrania el descubrimiento de que el ateismo es una falacia lógica, o error de razonamiento, o mentira que hace daño a niños inocentes y vulnerables, tiene que ser noticia. El ateísmo después de haber sido expuesto como una mentira sigue fuerte y los ateos permanecen impertérritos, como si no fuese con ellos. El ateísmo asume que Dios es la idea religiosa del creador de la creación y concluye erróneamente que no existe el creador porque una idea particular de Dios no existe. Si no entiendes la falacia del ateísmo niños te la explicarán porque es fácil de entender siendo honesto e imposible mintiéndose a uno mismo. Uno de los innumerables ejemplos de la falacia lógica del ateísmo es la cita de Epicuro “¿Dios está dispuesto a prevenir la maldad pero no puede? Entonces no es omnipotente. ¿No está dispuesto a prevenir la maldad, aunque podría hacerlo? Entonces es perverso. ¿Está dispuesto a prevenirla y además puede hacerlo? Si es así, ¿por qué hay maldad en el mundo? ¿No será que no está dispuesto a prevenirla ni tampoco puede hacerlo? Entonces, ¿para qué lo llamamos Dios?”. Con los argumentos presentados Epicuro solo puede concluir que un Dios omnipotente y benévolo no existe, no que no existe el creador de la creación. Los ateos no conciben que Dios no pueda ser diferente a la idea religiosa del creador de la creación y por eso la cita de Epicuro es considera por ellos prueba de que Dios no existe, y se equivocan porque creen. Los ateos presumen de ser todo evidencia y sin embargo han creído que el creador de la creación es un dios personal omnipotente y benévolo porque los religiosos se lo han dicho. El ateísmo defiende una idea sin argumentos y el resultado son veborrea, salir por peteneras e irracionalidades como “¿quién creó a dios?”, “asumes la creación” y un sin fin de otras. Para derrotar al ateísmo no tienes que defender tu idea particular de Dios, solo entender que de la no existencia no puede ser creada la existencia y por lo tanto la creación, o lo que tiene un principio de existencia, tuvo que ser creada por algo existente y eterno.

Independientemente de si existe Dios o no la cita de Epicuro es una falacia lógica. Y los ateos son unos pedantes hasta el punto de la náusea. Los ateos con toda su pedantería nauseante y su evidencia de pacotilla creen que jugar a las máquinas tragaperras causa una enfermedad en el cerebro llamada adicción. Por amor amor de Dios dejad de mentir aunque solo sea para no engañar a niños inocentes y vulnerables.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: